Put the economic issues aside for a minute – what about the possible contamination of underground acquifers by pumping all of that crap undergroud? I doubt that what they’re talking about would be 99-44/100′s percent pure carbon or COtimnv.ronEentalis2s (of which I consider myself one) don’t understand the enviornmental damage that will be done by chasing after the wrong problem of atmospheric CO2.I shake my head every day at the pompous, world-class stupidity going on regarding global warming, and how absolutely silly it will all look in another thirty (ten?) years as more of the real climatological story emerges.